Final Project – Radical Reading Room

1 Leave a comment on paragraph 1 0 The subject of my final project has morphed somewhat since I presented my Very Rough Sketch in class. As I thought more about where the interactivity of my “syllabus project” should be centered, I realized that I really wanted the space to be somewhere laypeople can visit for guidance and recommendations, and that it mattered to me more than I thought that the place have a clear social mission. So, I’ve scrapped the “tag as you browse” and “volunteer curators” parts of my design and am instead proposing a database assembled out of consultations with sociologists, historians, political scientists, and other professional smart people, which users can browse and build into a social reading agenda of sorts. There would be a forum space for discussion of the pieces, a way to nominate other content, and a simple process by which to share one’s creation on social media. The bulk of the work for the team would involve these consultations plus extensive metadata work so that the search and filter features function as helpfully as possible. A lot of web design and database management skills would be required. And it would involve the labor of very kind and generous academics willing to devote time, energy, and brain space to a thing that would neither compensate them financially nor give them individual credit for their suggestions!

2 Leave a comment on paragraph 2 0 Furthermore, although I’ve written an NEH grant proposal, I am fairly certain that this is not the sort of project that would top the selection list under a Trump administration. Its working title is “radical reading room,” so proposing this may land me on a rather different sort of list were I to actually proceed with an application. But I think the many wonderful individual syllabi that have been created and shared widely in the last year are a testament to the need that exists outside of strictly academic spaces for vetted learning materials in the face of political and social upheaval, as well as the willingness of at least some academics to help build curated things for a public audience.

3 Leave a comment on paragraph 3 0 What I would really like is to make a space that educates from a place of authority without sinking into the faux-objective explainery derided, rightly, in this Current Affairs piece on Vox Media. MOOCs seem to have achieved this balance fairly well—but that may be due to the content-agnosticism of the space. Trying to preserve authority while simultaneously decentering it, as I am proposing here, may prove to deliver the worst, not the best, of both. In any case, this is a tension that I am not going to be able to resolve anytime soon, if ever, so I have gone ahead and written something that proposes with confidence the development of a thing that may be riddled with irresolvable theoretical contradictions! Failing forward, ahoy!

4 Leave a comment on paragraph 4 0

5 Leave a comment on paragraph 5 0 ETA: This link to “A Library of Resistance” JUST appeared in my newsfeed.

6 Leave a comment on paragraph 6 0 This is a community created, community shared and edited, living document. (It started as a Facebook post & comments.) If you have some time to spare, please begin to sort and assemble and add to this collection of authors and documents. This will be organized alphabetically by author’s last name.

7 Leave a comment on paragraph 7 0 A) This is awesome. B) Do you think they are interested in moving this list into an interactive database and getting busy with some metadata?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.


  1. Posted December 22, 2016 at 8:42 pm | Permalink

    Hi Carolyn, I enjoyed your follow-up. Looking at the Library of Resistance list (and formatting rules) being compiled in real time is very interesting! On one hand I feel that a familiar, shared document platform like Google Docs can serve its purpose in an immediate context. On the other hand, as this list is already over 300 items long and spreads over 12 pages only after 3 days, I can definitely see the value of your proposal. Perhaps a public Zotero group is a slightly better option as the list grows? Negotiating timeliness and robust organization seems like an important issue here.

    A few things popped into my mind as I was reading, so here goes (although you are probably aware of many of this):

    The Open Syllabus Project. Your focus on social mission might make OSP too comprehensive for your use, but the related texts that come below a search result in OSP’s Explorer (http://explorer.opensyllabusproject.org/) could be useful in certain ways. If they open up their API soon enough, it might also be something to explore.

    Social bookmarks services could serve as proof of concept for the putting-together-and-sharing part. The design you showed us last time reminded me of are.na specifically:

    Also, throwing in another reading list by Francis Tseng in the collection: http://speculatingfutures.club/

  2. Posted December 25, 2016 at 7:45 pm | Permalink

    I’m excited about this project!

    It sounds similar to, but way more sophisticated than something I was part of a while ago http://radicalreference.info/readyref. The creators being librarians, the “ready reference” resources were more like online subject guides or structured, annotated bibliographies than syllabi. I wonder if research guides could be adjunct to the syllabi? Or a module? I wonder what other modules there could be to syllabi?

Additional comments powered byBackType

  • Archives

  • Welcome to Digital Praxis 2016-2017

    Encouraging students think about the impact advancements in digital technology have on the future of scholarship from the moment they enter the Graduate Center, the Digital Praxis Seminar is a year-long sequence of two three-credit courses that familiarize students with a variety of digital tools and methods through lectures offered by high-profile scholars and technologists, hands-on workshops, and collaborative projects. Students enrolled in the two-course sequence will complete their first year at the GC having been introduced to a broad range of ways to critically evaluate and incorporate digital technologies in their academic research and teaching. In addition, they will have explored a particular area of digital scholarship and/or pedagogy of interest to them, produced a digital project in collaboration with fellow students, and established a digital portfolio that can be used to display their work. The two connected three-credit courses will be offered during the Fall and Spring semesters as MALS classes for master’s students and Interdisciplinary Studies courses for doctoral students.

    The syllabus for the course can be found at cuny.is/dps17.

  • Categories

Need help with the Commons? Visit our
help page
Send us a message
Skip to toolbar